FaceTite, BodyTite and AccuTite: How Radiofrequency-Assisted Tightening Works
FaceTite, BodyTite and AccuTite use radiofrequency under the skin to tighten tissue. What studies show about results and complications, who is a candidate, and what to know before surgery later.
FaceTite, BodyTite and AccuTite are minimally invasive treatments that use radiofrequency (RF) energy under the skin to heat and tighten tissue. The short answer: they can improve mild to moderate laxity, especially in the lower face and neck, with a lower risk than surgery, but they don't replace a facelift, and they may make later surgery more difficult.
How the devices work
These devices are made by InMode. A probe goes under the skin through a small entry point while an external electrode measures temperature. RF energy heats fat and connective tissue to cause contraction (Locketz and Bloom, Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am, 2019).
| Device | Typical areas |
|---|---|
| FaceTite | Lower face, jawline, neck |
| BodyTite | Larger body areas such as abdomen, arms, thighs |
| AccuTite | A smaller probe for small areas |
We didn't find independent published trials specific to AccuTite, so we make no specific claims about its results.
What the evidence shows
In a study of 247 patients treated with FaceTite plus fractional RF for the lower face and neck (Dayan et al., Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open, 2020):
| Outcome | Result |
|---|---|
| Improvement in laxity score | 1.4 points on average |
| Patients pleased with results | 93% |
| Prolonged swelling | 4.8% |
| Hardened area (induration) | 3.2% |
| Temporary jawline nerve weakness | 1.2% |
All complications resolved. The authors described the approach as an option for patients who aren't ready for a facelift, not a replacement for one.
A 2019 review concluded that percutaneous RF can provide meaningful tightening in the lower face and neck for well-selected patients (Locketz and Bloom, Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am, 2019).
Impact on later surgery
A 2026 study of 180 neck lifts found 68% of patients had prior nonsurgical treatments, including FaceTite and Morpheus8 (O'Daniel and Patton, Aesthet Surg J, 2026). In these patients, surgeons found:
- Scar tissue (fibrosis) and lost tissue planes
- Fat loss under the skin
- A need for deeper surgery in 94%
- Longer operating times
If you might want a facelift or neck lift later, discuss this with a surgeon first.
Who may be a candidate
- Mild to moderate laxity
- People who want to avoid or delay surgery
- Realistic expectations about modest results
Significant loose skin is usually better treated surgically.
Recovery
Expect swelling and some bruising. A compression garment is commonly used. Less common problems in the study above included prolonged swelling, hardened areas and temporary nerve weakness. Follow your provider's aftercare instructions.
Compared with other RF options
| Option | Depth |
|---|---|
| External RF devices | Surface heating; mild results (Austin et al., Dermatol Surg, 2022) |
| RF microneedling | Needles deliver RF into the skin |
| FaceTite and similar | RF delivered under the skin; more invasive |
Frequently asked questions
Is FaceTite permanent? Aging continues, so results don't last forever.
Is it a facelift alternative? For mild laxity, possibly. Not for significant sagging.
How many sessions? Usually one.
This article is for educational purposes only and is not medical advice. Talk to a board-certified dermatologist about your situation.
Sources
- Locketz GD, Bloom JD. Percutaneous radiofrequency technologies for the lower face and neck. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2019. PubMed
- Dayan E et al. Multimodal radiofrequency application for lower face and neck laxity. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020. PubMed
- O'Daniel TG, Patton S. Neck lift after nonsurgical treatments: fibrosis, fat loss, and surgical complexity. Aesthet Surg J. 2026. PubMed
- Austin GK et al. Evaluating the effectiveness and safety of radiofrequency for face and neck rejuvenation: a systematic review. Lasers Surg Med. 2022. PubMed
